Comments Opposing Proposed Regulation Barring Asylum to Those Entering Between US Ports of Entry

Published: January 7, 2019

Comments Opposing Proposed Regulation Barring Asylum to Those Entering Between US Ports of Entry

The American Immigration Council and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) submitted a joint comment opposing the “Interim Final Rule: Aliens Subject to a Bar on Entry Under Certain Presidential Proclamations; Procedures for Protection.”

The Rule, which was published in the Federal Register on November 9, 2018 and which has commonly been termed an “asylum ban,” is contrary to existing law and is based on demonstrably false premises.  Although the rule has not yet taken effect due to ongoing litigation, if the rule does get implemented, it would bar migrants who cross the border without authorization between ports of entry at the U.S.-Mexico border from seeking asylum outside of official ports of entry. 

Further, implementation of the rule would strip fundamental protections from vulnerable individuals fleeing persecution and would undermine America’s legacy as a leader on the global stage.

Related Resources

Map The Impact

Explore immigration data where you live

Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.

100+

datapoints about immigrants and their contributions

Make a contribution

Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.

logoimg