Federal Courts/Jurisdiction

Federal Courts/Jurisdiction

Court Rejects Government Attempt to Redact Names of Immigration Judges

Court Rejects Government Attempt to Redact Names of Immigration Judges

This summer, the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) in its lawsuit seeking the disclosure of unredacted versions of complaints filed against immigration judges. To date, the government has refused to turn over the names, locations, and genders… Read More

Court Rules that Individuals Seeking Protection Must Have Bond Hearing

Court Rules that Individuals Seeking Protection Must Have Bond Hearing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York issued an important decision in July recognizing certain noncitizens’ right to a bond hearing before an immigration judge. It was a victory not only for the petitioner, a Guatemalan man seeking protection in the United States, but also will likely… Read More

FOIA Documents Reveal Government Always Knew Flores Settlement Applies to All Children

FOIA Documents Reveal Government Always Knew Flores Settlement Applies to All Children

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that the 1997 settlement in Flores v. Reno—which governs the detention, treatment and release of immigrant children—covers both unaccompanied and accompanied minors. This was a direct repudiation of the position the government took while defending its family detention policies in… Read More

Court Again Rules Against Federal Government's Efforts to Detain Children

Court Again Rules Against Federal Government’s Efforts to Detain Children

The American Immigration Council and the American Immigration Lawyers Association commented on the decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the nearly 20-year-old Flores Settlement Agreement governs the custody and release of all immigrant children, and that the Obama Administration’s family detention practices violate that agreement. Read More

Asylum Seekers File Class Action Lawsuit Against DHS

Asylum Seekers File Class Action Lawsuit Against DHS

The U.S. Government has placed unnecessary hurdles in front of asylum seekers who are attempting to file asylum applications within the required time period. Read More

Federal Court Grants Class-Action Status in Challenge to Obama Administration

Federal Court Grants Class-Action Status in Challenge to Obama Administration

A federal court has granted class-action status to a lawsuit challenging the federal government's failure to provide children in immigration court with lawyers in their deportation hearings. Several thousand children are estimated to be members of the class. Read More

Court Orders Release of Some Evidence of Arizona Border Patrol Detention Facilities

Court Orders Release of Some Evidence of Arizona Border Patrol Detention Facilities

A federal district court unsealed some of the photographs central to ongoing litigation challenging deplorable and unconstitutional conditions in Border Patrol detention facilities in the agency’s Tucson Sector. The court also allowed the Arizona Republic newspaper to intervene in the case to argue for the release of the documents. Read More

Lawsuit Seeks to Shed Light on Customs and Border Protection's Complaint Process

Lawsuit Seeks to Shed Light on Customs and Border Protection’s Complaint Process

he American Immigration Council (Immigration Council), represented by Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, today filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act to compel the release of additional documents related to the complaints process at United States Customs and Border Protection. Read More

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in U.S. v. Texas

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in U.S. v. Texas

Washington D.C. – Today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Texas. The highest court will now decide whether the President’s deferred action initiatives announced in November 2014, known as expanded DACA and DAPA, move forward. “The lawyers arguing for the deferred action initiatives made a convincing case that… Read More

326 Immigrant Rights Groups Urge Supreme Court to Let Immigration Relief Programs Go Forward

326 Immigrant Rights Groups Urge Supreme Court to Let Immigration Relief Programs Go Forward

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A diverse coalition of 326 immigration, civil rights, labor, and social service groups has filed an amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Texas, urging the court to lift the injunction that blocked the executive actions on immigration that President Obama announced in November… Read More

All gifts are matched dollar for dollar up to $75,000

No one should face the immigration system alone

logoimg