Federal Appeals Court Enjoins Two Provisions of Alabama’s Extreme Immigration Law

Published: October 14, 2011

Author: Seth Hoy

Federal Appeals Court Enjoins Two Provisions of Alabama’s Extreme Immigration Law The American Immigration Council does not endorse or oppose candidates for elected office. We aim to provide analysis regarding the implications of the election on the U.S. immigration system.

Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit temporarily blocked two controversial provisions of Alabama’s extreme immigration law, HB 56. A federal appeals court enjoined the provision requiring public school to determine the immigration status of enrolling students and the status of their parents as well as the provision that made it a criminal misdemeanor for an unauthorized immigrant to fail to carry immigration documentation. The provision that requires law enforcement officers to determine the immigration status of those stopped, detained, or arrested whom they reasonably suspect is in the country illegally—along with other provisions—remains in effect. Meanwhile, according to the New York Times, the 11th Circuit court has expedited the appeals process and is scheduled to hear arguments within the next two months.

Related Resources

Map The Impact

Explore immigration data where you live

Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.

100+

datapoints about immigrants and their contributions

Make a contribution

Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.

logoimg