Challenging Unconstitutional Conditions in CBP Detention Facilities

Doe v. Wolf, No. 15-00250 (D. Ariz. filed June 8, 2015)

Published: June 8, 2015

Status: 
PENDING

Challenging Unconstitutional Conditions in CBP Detention Facilities

Doe v. Wolf, No. 15-00250 (D. Ariz. filed June 8, 2015)

The American Immigration Council, the National Immigration Law Center, the ACLU of Arizona, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, and Morrison & Foerster LLP filed a class-action lawsuit challenging detention conditions in U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detention facilities. The complaint alleges that Tucson Sector Border Patrol holds men, women, and children in freezing, overcrowded, and filthy cells for days at a time in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Detained individuals are: stripped of outer layers of clothing and forced to suffer in brutally cold temperatures; deprived of beds, bedding, and sleep; denied adequate food, water, medicine and medical care, and basic sanitation and hygiene items such as soap, sufficient toilet paper, sanitary napkins, diapers, and showers; and held virtually incommunicado in these conditions for days.

Plaintiffs in the suit are two women detained in the Tucson Border Patrol Station as well as a Tucson man detained twice in that facility. All Plaintiffs consistently recount days of mistreatment and neglect during their time in Border Patrol holding cells; their accounts are fully consistent with dozens of former detainees interviewed prior to filing the suit.

The District Court certified a class consisting of all individuals who are or will be detained by the U.S. Border Patrol in the Tucson Sector, and, in 2016, granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Among other things, the Court ordered Border Patrol to provide all class members detained for 12 or more hours with a mat to sleep on, supply sufficient toiletries and bathing wipes to all class members, and ensure that all were provided meals at regular intervals and clean drinking water.

Following a seven-day trial in January 2020, the District Court granted Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction finding that the conditions in detention facilities in Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector violate the U.S. Constitution. Under the court’s ruling, migrants may not be detained in these facilities for more than 48 hours, unless Border Patrol provides for their “basic human needs.” In addition to the requirements imposed under the preliminary injunction, further requirements imposed by the court after 48 hours include providing:

  • a bed with a blanket;
  • access to food that meets acceptable dietary standards and potable water; and
  • a medical assessment by a medical professional.

The court also clarified that the opportunity to shower, by definition, does not mean mere access to a “paper-shower” or “shower-wipe” and that Border Patrol must ensure that overcrowding in the detention cells does not result in migrants having to sleep in the toilet areas. On April 17, 2020, the court issued an order for permanent injunction specifying the exact terms governing how the court’s ruling will be implemented.  Defendants have ninety days to fully comply with the court’s order.


Documents & Others


Former Detainees Describe Horrific Conditions in CBP Detention

The following are excerpts from the statements of men and women subjected to appalling conditions in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) holding cells in the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector. Many of the statements were submitted in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for class certification. Attorneys representing the plaintiffs and class members in Doe v.

View File

Complaint

June 8, 2015

View File

Motion for Class Certification

June 8, 2015 

View File

Order Granting Class Certification

January 11, 2016

View File

Motion for Expedited Discovery

June 23, 2015

View File

Court Order Granting Expedited Discovery

August 14, 2015

View File

Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Against Defendants for Destroying Evidence

September 28, 2015

View File

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

August 14, 2015

View File

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

September 17, 2015

View File

Order on Motion to Dismiss

January 11, 2016

View File

Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction

December 4, 2015

View File

Declaration by Joe Goldenson, M.D.

December 4, 2015

Submitted in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, this medical expert’s declaration addresses the inadequacies of medical screening and treatment provided individuals detained in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona.  

View File

Declaration by Eldon Vail

December 4, 2015

Submitted in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, this retired jail administrator’s expert declaration addresses inadequacies in the detention conditions in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona.

View File

Declaration by Robert W. Powitz

December 4, 2015

Submitted in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, this jail sanitation expert’s declaration addresses problems with hygiene in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona.

View File

Preliminary Injunction Order

November 18, 2016

View File

Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Appeal of the Preliminary Injunction

March 30, 2017

View File

Brief in Support of Defendants’ Cross-Appeal

May 2, 2017

View File

Plaintiffs’ Response and Reply Brief

May 25, 2017

View File

Defendants’ Reply Brief

June 12, 2017

View File

Ninth Circuit Decision

December 22, 2017

View File

Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment

June 19, 2018

View File

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement the Summary Judgment Evidence

August 15, 2018

View File

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

February 19, 2020

View File

Judgment in a Civil Case

February 19, 2020

View File

Order for Permanent Injunction

April 17, 2020

View File

Map The Impact

Explore immigration data where you live

Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.

100+

datapoints about immigrants and their contributions

Related Resources

Make a contribution

Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.

logoimg