Challenging USCIS “Not a Specialty Occupation” H-1B Petition Denial

Shandilya, et al. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et alCase 1:18-cv-02382

Status: 
CLOSED

Challenging USCIS “Not a Specialty Occupation” H-1B Petition Denial

Shandilya, et al. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et alCase 1:18-cv-02382

Demand for educated workers in the professions often outweighs the supply of qualified workers. To assist in filling this gap, Congress enacted the H-1B nonimmigrant visa classification for employers with jobs in a “specialty occupation.” A “specialty occupation” requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) to enter the occupation in the United States. Agency regulations provide criteria—any one of which is sufficient—for a petitioning employer to show that its job is in a specialty occupation.

In recent years, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has been denying H-1B petitions for jobs that the agency previously approved as being in a specialty occupation. This case is representative. USCIS misreads a description of educational requirements in the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) for the relevant occupation and, based on this, erroneously concludes that a bachelor’s degree in a specific specialty is not normally required.

The plaintiffs, a large construction company and its long-time, valued employee, challenged the denial of an H-1B petition that included an extension of the employee’s H-1B status. The company had promoted the employee to an Assistant Project Manager. Plaintiffs argue that the job meets one or more of the criteria for a specialty occupation and that USCIS unlawfully denied the petition and extension by misreading the OOH.

USCIS reopened and approved the H-1B petition before even filing an answer in the case. Since the plaintiffs received the relief they wanted, they filed a notice dismissing the suit.

The Council served as co-counsel, with Deborah Notkin and Troy Palmer of Barst Mukamal & Kleiner LLP, under the Council’s program to encourage business immigration attorneys to file suit to challenge unlawful agency denials of employment-based petitions.


Documents & Others


Complaint

October 16, 2018

View File

Map The Impact

Explore immigration data where you live

Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.

100+

datapoints about immigrants and their contributions

Related Resources

Make a contribution

Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.

logoimg