FOIA Lawsuit Demands Information About CBP Officers’ Role in Credible Fear Interview Process

FOIA Lawsuit Demands Information About CBP Officers’ Role in Credible Fear Interview Process

American Immigration Council v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et. al., No. 1:19-cv-02965 (D.D.C filed Oct. 2, 2019)

STATUS:
Pending

This Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeks to uncover information about a troubling program where U.S. Custom and Border Protection (CBP) officers screened asylum seekers. The suit, filed on behalf of the American Immigration Council and Tahirih Justice Center, challenges the government’s failure to respond to multiple FOIA requests for records relating to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) decision to train and utilize CBP officers to conduct asylum screenings known as credible fear interviews (CFIs).

Congress intended that CFIs serve as a safeguard from summary removal. If an asylum seeker passes this initial screening, he or she must be given the opportunity to file an asylum claim before an immigration judge. As threshold screenings, these interviews are not intended to be adversarial but rather function to provide the asylum seeker an opportunity to recount details of their feared persecution in their country of origin. Asylum seekers often describe instances of physical and sexual violence and other trauma to explain why they seek protection in the United States during a CFI. For decades, these interviews have been conducted by a corps of asylum officers employed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), trained specifically to adjudicate asylum claims, including the handling of sensitive matters.

In the spring of 2019, USCIS and CBP began a pilot program to transfer responsibility for conducting CFIs from USCIS to CBP, a law enforcement agency with a well-documented history of antagonism towards asylum-seekers. The pilot program was marked by secrecy throughout, with the government releasing virtually no information to the public. Though the pilot program was preliminarily enjoined as unlawful, details about CBP’s role in credible fear screenings are still vital. The public has a compelling interest in knowing like how and why immigration authorities designed a program to replace highly trained asylum officers with CBP officers and the effect the program had on the credible fear process, including on asylum seekers subjected to the program.

In response to the suit, Defendants released thousands of pages of government records detailing the program, including USCIS training materials that provide important insight into how the agency conducts screenings and adjudicates claims for asylum. Though the government documents helped reveal information about the credible fear screening process, many documents were redacted and remain hidden from the public.

On June 18, Plaintiffs filed a brief outlining for the court why Defendants improperly withheld records under FOIA exemptions and Defendants CBP failed to conduct an adequate search. The Council requested that the court order Defendants to produce the disputed records and order CBP to conduct an adequate search.

Follow this case:

  • October 2, 2019
    The American Immigration Council and Tahirih Justice Center filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in federal court to compel the government to release records about the Trump administration’s troubling new practice of allowing U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to screen individuals seeking asylum in the United States. The lawsuit seeks these documents to shed light on changes to the asylum screening process, CBP’s role in conducting interviews and making determinations regarding an asylum seeker’s “credible fear” of persecution, and the measures taken by CBP, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and the Department of Homeland Security to implement this new practice.

Most Read

  • Publications
  • Blog Posts
  • Past:
  • Trending