This Practice Advisory describes the Supreme Court’s decision in Judulang v. Holder, which rejected the BIA’s “comparable grounds” test for § 212(c) relief, and offers strategies for lawful permanent residents and others who may be affected by it.
Published: July 14, 2016
Share:
Related Resources
Strategies and Considerations in the Wake of Niz-Chavez v. Garland
- Asylum
- June 30, 2021
This practice advisory by the Council and partners provides an overview of the Niz-Chavez v. Garland decision and its impact on eligibility for cancellation of removal; eligibility for post-conclusion voluntary departure and broader applications of the decision.
Read More
'Freedom of Information Act and Immigration Agencies
- Adjustment of Status
- June 4, 2021
This Practice Advisory provides a broad overview of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), including how to make a FOIA request and how to appeal an inadequate response.
Read More
Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum
- Immigration Benefits and Relief
- October 22, 2019
This practice advisory provides a brief overview of administrative closure and explains the impact of that decision on the future availability of administrative closure, as well as on cases that are currently administratively closed.
Read MoreMap The Impact
Explore immigration data where you live
Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.
100+
datapoints about immigrants and their contributions
Make a contribution
Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.
