Comparisons of the mostly “minority” foreign-born and mostly “white” native-born populations that fail to account for the socioeconomic impact of ethnicity incorrectly suggest that place of birth, rather than minority status, is the primary factor explaining disparities between immigrants and natives. However, a more accurate – and fair – comparison of immigrants and natives within the same ethnic group suggests otherwise.
Published: November 1, 2003
Share:
Related Resources
Contributions of New Americans in Mid-Michigan
- Economics of Immigration
- April 1, 2025
New research from the American Immigration Council shows that immigrants in the mid-Michigan region play a crucial role as taxpayers, workers, consumers, and more.
Read More
Testifying on the Catastrophic Economic and Humane Costs of Mass Deportations
- Border Enforcement
- December 10, 2024
The American Immigration Council appeared before Congress to address the catastrophic economic and humane costs of mass deportations.
Read More
Debunking the Myth of Immigrants and Crime
- Demographics
- October 17, 2024
Using Uniform Crime Reporting data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and population data from the U. S. Census Bureau, the Council created a report on the relationship between immigrants and crime.
Read MoreMap The Impact
Explore immigration data where you live
Our Map the Impact tool has comprehensive coverage of more than 100 data points about immigrants and their contributions in all 50 states and the country overall. It continues to be widely cited in places ranging from Gov. Newsom’s declaration for California’s Immigrant Heritage Month to a Forbes article and PBS’ Two Cents series that targets millennials and Gen Z.
100+
datapoints about immigrants and their contributions
Make a contribution
Make a direct impact on the lives of immigrants.
